Structure-Activity Relationship of Chalcones Against Influenza H1N1: Quantum Chemical Chemiometric Evaluation
Resumo
It is well known that the influenza virus causes annual epidemics provoking thousands of deaths annually. Although there is already a vaccine for influenza, the virus mutates and acquires seasonal resistance to medicines. Therefore, due to the urgent need for new compounds with the inhibitory potential of the virus, many studies have presented several substances to avoid inhibitory activity to the enzyme responsible for the release of the virus into the respiratory tract. Here, a demonstrative calculation of theoretical and chemometric was performed studies of a set of eight chalcones with potential inhibition of the neuraminidase enzyme. It was performed calculations of electronic structure to determine the geometric and
electronic parameters using the theory of density functional at M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level calculation. The relationship between the structure of the compounds and their activity against the H1N1 influenza virus was accessed by principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. We hope that our results can help to explain the activities of chalcone analogs to model new compounds with influenza virus activity.
Referências
1. Girard MP, Tam JS, Assossou OM, Kieny MP. The 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus pandemic: A review. Vaccine 2010;28:4895–4902.
2. Hancock K, Veguilla V, Lu X, Zhong W, Butler EN, et al. Crossreactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1945–1952.
3. Le TT, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, Roman RG, Tollefsen S, et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020;19:305–306.
4. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506.
5. Organization WH, others. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
6. Organization WH, others. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 72.
7. Qiu Y. Impacts of Social and Economic Factors on the Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID19 ) in China ∗. medRxiv2020; 2019:1–27.
8. Cui MY, Nie JX, Yan ZZ, Xiao MW, Lin D, et al. Design, synthesis, bioactivity, and DFT calculation of 2-thiazolyl-hydrazone derivatives as influenza neuraminidase inhibitors. Med Chem Res 2019;28:938–947.
9. Li H, Li M, Xu R, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. Synthesis, structure activity relationship and in vitro anti-influenza virus activity of novel polyphenol-pentacyclic triterpene conjugates. Elsevier Masson SAS. Epub ahead of print 2019.
10. Li G, Zhao JY, Niu C, Nie LF, Dong CZ, et al. Structure–activity relationship studies of 1-(1′ hydroxyalkyl)rupestonic acid methyl esters against influenza viruses. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 2017;27:1484–1487.
11. Neumann G, Noda T, Kawaoka Y. Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature 2009;459:931–939.
12. Organization WH, others. Ten things you need to know about pandemic influenza (update of 14 October 2005). Wkly Epidemiol Rec Relev épidémiologique Hebd 2005;80:428–431.
13. Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science (80- ) 2009;325:197–201.
14. Mercader AG, Pomilio AB. QSAR study of flavonoids and biflavonoids as influenza H1N1 virus neuraminidase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2010;45:1724–1730.
15. Gao L, Zu M, Wu S, Liu AL, Du GH. 3D QSAR and docking study of flavone derivatives as potent inhibitors of influenza H1N1 virus neuraminidase. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 2011;21:5964–5970.
16. Taylor NR, von Itzstein M. Molecular modeling studies on ligand binding to sialidase from influenza virus and the mechanism of catalysis. J Med Chem 1994;37:616–624.
17. Kim CU, Lew W, Williams MA, Liu H, Zhang L, et al. Influenza neuraminidase inhibitors possessing a novel hydrophobic interaction in the enzyme active site: design, synthesis, and structural analysis of carbocyclic sialic acid analogues with potent anti-influenza activity. J Am Chem Soc 1997;119:681–690.
18. Ison MG. Antivirals and resistance: influenza virus. Curr Opin Virol 2011;1:563–573.
19. Mu JX, Shi YX, Wu HK, Sun ZH, Yang MY, et al. Microwave assisted synthesis, antifungal activity, DFT and SAR study of 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyridine derivatives containing hydrazone moieties. Chem Cent J 2016;10:1–9.
20. Dao TT, Nguyen PH, Lee HS, Kim E, Park J, et al. Chalcones as novel influenza A (H1N1) neuraminidase inhibitors from Glycyrrhiza inflata. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 2011;21:294–298.
21. Alves CN, Pinheiro JC, Camargo AJ, Ferreira MMC, Romero RAF, et al. A multiple linear regression and partial least squares study of flavonoid compounds with anti-HIV activity. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 2001;541:81–88.
22. Camargo LTFM, Sena MM, Camargo AJ. A quantum chemical and chemometrical study of indolo[2,1-b]quinazoline and their analogues with cytotoxic activity against breast cancer cells. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2009;20:537–549.
23. Worachartcheewan A, Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. QSAR Study of H1N1 Neuraminidase Inhibitors from Influenza a Virus. Lett Drug Des Discov 2014;11:420–427.
24. Reed G. Feature Selection Methods in QSAR Studies. J AOAC Int 2012;95:5–24.
25. Vieira I, Camargo LTFM, Ribeiro L, Rodrigues ACC, Camargo AJ. Structure–activity relationship of tacrine and its analogues in relation to inhibitory activity against Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Model;25. Epub ahead of print 2019.
26. Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 1965;140:1133–1138.
27. Sharaf MA, Illman DL, Kowalski BR. Chemometrics. Wiley; 1986.
28. Stewart JJP. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods II. Applications. J Comput Chem 1989;10:221–264.
29. Hypercube Inc. HyperChem, Release 7.0.
30. Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other function. Theor Chem Acc 2008;120:215–241.
31. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian Inc Wallingford CT 2009;34:Wallingford CT.
32. Breneman CM, Wiberg KB. Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J Comput Chem 1990;11:361–373.
33. Camargo AJ, Honório KM, Mercadante R, Molfetta FA, Alves CN, et al. A Study of Neolignan Compounds with Biological Activity Against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis by Using Quantum Chemical and Chemometric Methods. J Braz Chem Soc 2003;14:809–814.
34. Martins GR, Napolitano HB, Camargo LTFM, Camargo AJ. Structure-activity relationship study of rutaecarpine analogous active against central nervous system cancer. J Braz Chem Soc 2012;23:2183–2190.
35. Karelson M, Lobanov VS, Katritzky AR. Quantum-Chemical Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR Studies. Chem Rev 1996;96:1027–1044.
36. Bhal SK. Understanding When to Use Log P & Log D. ACD/Labs - Adv Chem Dev Inc Toronto, Canada 2019;3–6.
37. Österberg T, Norinder U. Prediction of drug transport processes using simple parameters and PLS statistics - The use of ACD/logP and ACD/ChemSketch descriptors. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;12:327–
38. Rice-Evans C, Miller N, Paganga G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci 1997;2:152–159.
39. Rosa GP, Seca AML, Barreto M do C, Silva AMS, Pinto DCGA. Chalcones and flavanones bearing hydroxyl and/or methoxyl groups: Synthesis and biological assessments. Appl Sci;9. Epub ahead of print 2019.
40. Yaeghoobi M, Frimayanti N, Chee CF, Ikram KK, Najjar BO, et al. QSAR, in silico docking and in vitro evaluation of chalcone derivatives as potential inhibitors for H1N1 virus neuraminidase. Med Chem Res 2016;25:2133–2142.